CE3
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-justice-department-trump.html
Assenment
I am using a New York Time as to talk about Rob Rosenstein problem. This source is really
popular with it story, with popular viewers from newpaper to article. The company have
been around over 30 years and provide decent information with recent world
event. They have large varied of writer
that contribute to the story. A lot of story tends to varied from of different media . They cover almost everything from food to government. They are multi million dollar company.
This talk about Rob Rosenstein resign indicate, also the opinion of Donald Trump saying he was ready to fire him. This article talks about who is going to take over
his office. This then talk about a Russian investigation going on with Rob. This is then talk
about Rob Rosenstein’s clashing with Trump supporter. They then talk about the trial
of testifying at the court. They talk about Rob Rosenstein’s resign, and Rob was emotional about the situation. A
person name Kelly was negotiate Rob in closed door talk about resignation, now
the truth came out.
Analyze
This article have Video of Donald trump talk about the situation,
they try to tell what is the situation is with Rob Rosenstein and Donald trump.
This article really try to have other official government employee opinion on the matter, and try
to draw the reader in with reaction of current event. They also want to draw
the viewer in with emotional appeal of Rob Rosenstein on how he feel about situation They are trying to give a sense of
conflict between the people. They talk about people going on twitter and saying angry thing. The article try to indicate sign secretly among the government, secretly
detail some party talk.
Opinion
I think this source is decent to use as information, but it’s
not valuable for fact information source because it kind of seen that the writer of this
story try to provoke the viewers to tell to picks the side. I think this source try to get people opinion on matter, but not for full fact information. it the combination of opinion and some fact information of what going on with situation.
Comments
Post a Comment